![]() ![]() ![]() In conclusion, the protocol used in this study was not efficient to completely remove the smear layer especially in the apical third of the canal. However, the efficacy of citric acid was significantly less in the apical third compared with the coronal and middle thirds of the canals. In controlled clinical trials (Study 1 and Study 2), a total of 811. The comparison of three one thirds in each group showed no significant difference in the SmearClear and EDTA groups. ENDO 601 Current Li terature Review II 1.0 ENDO 602 Current Literature Review III 1.0 ENDO 603 Current Literature Review IV 1.0 ENDO 604 Current Literature Review V 1.0 ENDO 605 Current Literature Review VI 1.0 ENDO 606 Current Literature Review VII 1.0 ENDO 607 Endodontics Treatment Planning Conference I 1. clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. The results showed that there were no significant differences in the efficacy of three chelating agents at all levels of the root canals. The teeth were then processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the removal of the smear layer was examined in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds. After that, all the specimens were subjected to irrigation with 5.25% NaOCl. Each canal was subsequently irrigated with one of the following solutions: 5.25% NaOCl (control), SmearClear, 17% EDTA, or 10% citric acid. Forty-eight extracted single-rooted human teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 12) and instrumented using Mtwo nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Reprinted from The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, volume 6. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of SmearClear (Sybron Endo, Orange, CA), 17% EDTA, and 10% citric acid in smear layer removal. S3, Tables, figures, and Supplementary Material. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |